Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Performance\s+Air\s+Cleaners\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Performance\s+Air\s+Cleaners\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] Performance Air Cleaners (score: 1): Author: Jim Stone <1789alpine@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:13:23 -0500; I have been watching old episodes of Wheeler Dealers lately and the last two I saw were about an MX-5/Miata and BMW 3 Series. In both cases, one of the first things Edd did was replace the stock air; /html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00025.html (8,455 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] Performance Air Cleaners (score: 1): Author: Randall <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:07:43 -0700; Because manufacturers warranty the engine. There's also the emissions aspect of rings that wear out, and so on, plus most people don't like hearing intake noise. The K&N filters do flow more easily,; /html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00029.html (8,878 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] Performance Air Cleaners (score: 1): Author: John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:48:30 -0600; Not sure about the bimmer, but I know that on some of the GM cars I have owned the "cold air" performance filter had advantages and disadvantages. It did seem to improve performance, but only at the; /html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00030.html (10,950 bytes)
4. Re: [Shop-talk] Performance Air Cleaners (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:25:49 -0800; Well, substantially increased maintenance requirements and certain finicky incompatibilities with some engine controls, increased noise, potentially reduced engine life depending on the filter materi; /html/shop-talk/2014-11/msg00035.html (11,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]