Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*what\s+if\s+CG\s+was\s+same\s+as\s+roll\s+centers\'\s+axis\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*what\s+if\s+CG\s+was\s+same\s+as\s+roll\s+centers\'\s+axis\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:22:48 -0700; if you lowered the CG of a car to the point where it was on the line connecting the roll centers, what would happen? you would not have any body roll and so you wouldnt need sway bars. conversely, if; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00198.html (7,674 bytes)
2. Re: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: Larrybsp@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:33:14 EDT; Ifrom:larrybsp@aol.com (Larry Stark) James, With the CG on the roll axis there will be no body roll and you would have instant weight transfer as you turned the car. The effect would be like having n; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00199.html (8,553 bytes)
3. Re: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:46:37 -0700; so there would still be weight transfer? why? assuming stiff sidewall, there is no body roll, so wouldnt all the tires still be loaded evenly? thus no weight transfer. james -- Original Message -- Fr; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00200.html (8,951 bytes)
4. Re: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:32:11 -0700; James, you ought to know weight transfer causes body roll, not the other way around... The weight tranfer when the car is in a steady condition is always the same, because you have the torque between; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00201.html (8,767 bytes)
5. Re: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:46:20 -0400; Message text written by INTERNET:Larrybsp@aol.com " The centrifical force of the turn would transfer weight from the inside to outside tires in direct proportion to the rise in centrifical force and; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00204.html (7,956 bytes)
6. Re: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:50:00 -0400; Message text written by "John J. Stimson-III" "That doesn't mean that it won't roll due to vertical forces like sudden changes in the slope of the pavement or hopping up and down in the driver's seat; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00205.html (8,097 bytes)
7. RE: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <rbrown7@covad.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 20:01:01 -0700; Weight transfer depends only on the ratio of the cg height to the track. As Larry pointed out, adjusting the roll axis relative to the cg only determines what portion of weight transfer arises from t; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00209.html (9,788 bytes)
8. RE: what if CG was same as roll centers' axis (score: 1): Author: "Escano, Arnold (MP)" <aescano@guidant.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:47:57 -0700; I do that technique 'hop up/down' specially in Candlestick and sometimes i : fly-off,slam-down,scrape here,scrape there,get nose bleed (sudden elev.change), and that's just on my way to Grid ;) arnol; /html/ba-autox/2003-06/msg00222.html (8,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]