Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*what\'s\s+going\s+to\s+rule\s+GS\s+in\s+2001\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:10:12 -0500
In a frenzy of GS test driving, I drove a WRX, Type R, and Lexus IS300. My initial impressions are that the Type R is one Nasty Little Car - very racecar-like (light, noisy, ferocious in the upper re
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00659.html (7,996 bytes)

2. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: Snapspinnr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 01:23:02 EST
My guess is that the Type R will be the car for Topeka this year. But, the WRX will probably be "the" car to have in Pro-solos. The BMW 325 might also be a contender. If Subaru puts up some contingen
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00666.html (7,850 bytes)

3. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:46:54 -0600
It depends mostly on who is driving what. That's a pretty safe bet really, but my heart tells me to watch for the TT. Fun is right...GS is a great looking class. Pat Washburn the also IMHO Patrick Wa
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00672.html (8,616 bytes)

4. RE: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Timko" <dtimko@cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:13:30 -0500
I don't know, Arthur Emerson was in the TT this year at Meridian. I was amazed when I saw he ran the exact same time (to the thousandth) twice in a row. That tends to tell me he was pushing his car p
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00674.html (9,520 bytes)

5. RE: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Moon <moon-7@blazenet.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:09:47 -0500
The TT seems to have a lot of potential in both the Pros and Tours. Let's just hope that Neal Sapp doesn't decide he fancies Arthur's TT for a ride this year instead of last year's BMW loaner. Eric M
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00675.html (8,887 bytes)

6. RE: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:24:41
It isn't too hard to be consistant when you're driving the whole course with *both* feet on the throttle. (Left foot on top of right foot to make sure it doesn't lift!) On Sunday, I was 100% flat on
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00679.html (10,161 bytes)

7. RE: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Timko" <dtimko@cc.gatech.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:40:14 -0500
Yes, I remember that! You are right. I didn't get a chance to look at yours at Meridian. Not close enough anyway. That's what I _meant_ to say! ..I promise.. Dan Timko
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00680.html (8,638 bytes)

8. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:16:38 -0600
My personal pick is the FWD. AWD carries the extra wieght without giving enough back in return. I think the Audi "fix" has a big impact as well, and a "non-fixed" car is much better set up. The TT re
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00685.html (9,171 bytes)

9. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:26:57 -0800
I'd expect the Type 'R' to beat anything that out weighs it... oh wait, that's everything else in the class... The WRX is probably just a touch too plump, laggy, and tire limited to be the Big Dog. U
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00699.html (9,138 bytes)

10. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:06:01 -0500
We had a couple of WRX's at yesterday's Texas Region season opener. One was the WRX wagon, which to me doesn't look much more plump than the sedan....New solo driver in that car, so not a whole lot o
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00709.html (10,124 bytes)

11. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "SoloRacer.com" <soloracerdotcom@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Actually, the Celica GT-S is lighter than the R. By just how much, is questionable, but I've heard 75-100 lbs. == Brett at SoloRacer.com 1998 Integra Type R - GS 75 1996 Integra GSR - STS 57 http://
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00714.html (11,384 bytes)

12. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:06:00 -0500
John Joyce came down to Texas from Oklahoma Sunday and drove his new Celica, the E Stock model. John was running F stock times in that car, and we have some great F stock driver's here, including a c
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00721.html (12,356 bytes)

13. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@spec-rx7.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:01:19 -0600
"John Joyce came down to Texas from Oklahoma Sunday and drove his new Celica, the E Stock model. John was running F stock times in that car, and we have some great F stock driver's here, including a
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00730.html (8,474 bytes)

14. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: "JCGZ3" <jcgz3@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:06:10 -0800
"watch for the TT"... This is a joke right? ;-). Have you ever see a FWD TT on the scales??? ...Didn't think so ;-). It ain't pretty, like over 2900lbs (despite what any publications say). This car i
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00750.html (8,297 bytes)

15. Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Monday <boysrus_racing@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:17:01 -0800 (PST)
I just bought a Celica GT-S. I've not driven a Type-R, but it would be hard to beat having a limited slip when you get above 150 hp on the front wheels. The GT-S likes running between 6000 and 8000 r
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00783.html (8,938 bytes)

16. RE: what's going to rule GS in 2001? (score: 1)
Author: knuckledragger@kcweb.net
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:23:53 -0600
Just don't miss a single one of those shifts Bob. I have personally seen 3 GT-S Celicas blow their engines due to just one (not that grossly) missed shift. All engines turned over like they had no co
/html/autox/2001-03/msg00784.html (8,355 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu