Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*we\s+don\'t\s+need\s+no\s+steenkin\'\s+navigation\s+system\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*we\s+don\'t\s+need\s+no\s+steenkin\'\s+navigation\s+system\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:42:33 -0400 (); Per the following news item: A show of hands, please, for all of you whose Triumphs were affected yesterday...I thought as much. ;-) ** NAVIGATION SYSTEMS FAIL IN SOME JAPANESE CARS In Japan, the nav; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01822.html (8,461 bytes)
2. Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:07:58 -0700 (PDT); Hell I never knew where I was before how would I know where I'am now ?????????????????? Dave Eaton 71 GT6 MK3 68 Spitfire MK3 62&65 Heralds TSSC NW/USA/rep Olympia, Washington (the state) http://www.; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01826.html (7,312 bytes)
3. Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:56:02 -0600; Hmmm... I find this a most curious explanation for the problem. If the week counter was absolute, i.e., the device began counting weeks from the time it was first turned on, that would mean that Japa; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01863.html (8,447 bytes)
4. RE: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:47:25 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"; No, they meant weeks. The weeks counter goes to 1024 and then rolls over to 0. Some GPS devices did not have the programming adjusted to figure in the rollover. Thus when August 21, 1999 at 8:00 P.M.; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01870.html (9,386 bytes)
5. Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 07:15:00 -0400; The counter counts from an arbitrary starting point that represents the birth of the GPS system 19 years ago, not the startup of the individual receiver. Sam; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01872.html (8,442 bytes)
6. Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:50:34 -0400; whose and Hmmm... I find this a most curious explanation for the problem. If the week counter was absolute, i.e., the device began counting weeks from the time it was first turned on, that would mean; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01877.html (8,596 bytes)
7. Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 09:37:50 EDT; << show of hands, please, for all of you whose Triumphs were affected yesterday...I thought as much. ;-) ** NAVIGATION SYSTEMS FAIL IN SOME JAPANESE CARS >> HA HA HA.....my humble navigator (wife) an; /html/triumphs/1999-08/msg01945.html (7,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]