Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*trunnion\s+bush\s+length\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*trunnion\s+bush\s+length\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. trunnion bush length (score: 1): Author: John Loftus <loftusdesign@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:14:00 -0700; When tying to install new trunnion bushes (rubber bushes with steel sleeve positioned between the ends of the two shock arms) I was running into great difficulty getting the shock arms to bottom in t; /html/healeys/2005-06/msg00512.html (7,225 bytes)
2. Re: trunnion bush length (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:50:47 -0600; Hi John, The original bushings are intended to have the steel sleeves clamped solid before the rubber is clamped. The rubber bushing is a torsion spring, bonded to the sleeve & clamped into the arms,; /html/healeys/2005-06/msg00515.html (8,414 bytes)
3. Re: trunnion bush length (score: 1): Author: John Loftus <loftusdesign@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:46:09 -0700; Hi Dave, Thanks for the detailed reply. My problem with the new bushes is that the metal sleeve was longer than what was in there before and consequently would bottom out well before the fulcrum bolt; /html/healeys/2005-06/msg00518.html (9,479 bytes)
4. Re: trunnion bush length (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:47:19 -0600; Hi John, You are correct. My original bushings and the new bushings from Peter at Worldwide Auto Parts both measure .875" on the sleeve length. I can't imagine how Moss got the length wrong, but it w; /html/healeys/2005-06/msg00521.html (10,248 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]