Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*soft\s+top\s+frames\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*soft\s+top\s+frames\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. soft top frames (score: 1): Author: JohnZissler@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:23:47 EDT; Hi all, While we are on the subject of soft tops, I was wondering which frame to use on my MkII, does anyone know if it is better to use a MKIII frame or the smaller MkII frame. Or is there no differ; /html/spitfires/2003-08/msg00141.html (7,416 bytes)
2. RE: soft top frames (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:19:01 +0100; AFAIK, the MkIII frame has a proper folding mechanism, unlike the MkII which is more of a dismantling thingy. The MkIII frame won't bolt straight up to a MkII body, but should be able to with a few; /html/spitfires/2003-08/msg00146.html (7,538 bytes)
3. RE: soft top frames (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET>; Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:31:09 -0700; Hi all, While we are on the subject of soft tops, I was wondering which frame to use on my MkII, does anyone know if it is better to use a MKIII frame or the smaller MkII frame. Or is there no differ; /html/spitfires/2003-08/msg00147.html (8,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]