Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bars\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bars\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com; Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:36:02 EDT; I/m interested in improving the handling of my car. I already have rebuilt the front and rear ends with uprated springs, poly bushings, KYB shocks and rear tube shock conversion. I'm running Yokohama; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00485.html (7,358 bytes)
2. Re: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:41:22 -0700 (PDT); Joe--My opinion here is that the rear bar should always be smaller in diameter than the front bar, (or have longer arms to lessen its rate) A lot depends on how you drive the car, knowing that too mu; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00490.html (7,290 bytes)
3. RE: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: "Shawn J. Loseke" <sloseke@holly.colostate.edu>; Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:44:57 -0600; with the stock front bar you can expect quite a bit of an oversteer characteristic to develop. A much more dangerous characteristic than understeer especially in the wet. While oversteer is more fun; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00492.html (9,105 bytes)
4. RE: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: william.mcintire@wright.edu; Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:01:06 -0400; Joe - Long time ago I put Addco heavy duty fron and rear bars on my 6. Plowed like a pig (or whatever). Put the stock bar back on the front whith the heavy on the rear (3/4" I think). It may have bee; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00495.html (8,052 bytes)
5. RE: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:16:40 -0700; is 3/4", and is not adjustable. The price is right, but I wonder about compatibility with the stock front bar (11/16"?) How is installation? What can I expect in performance improvements? Joe, The r; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00497.html (7,550 bytes)
6. Re: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:25:07 EST; Thanks to all who chimed in about my sway bar question. It seems that most everyone agrees that a rear sway bar is probably not a great idea on a car that is driven primarily on the road. What I'd li; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00534.html (7,349 bytes)
7. Re: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:15:21 EST; Robert et al., My request to "drive" was entirely sarcastic. My track driving experience is limited entirely to what I experienced at TRF this summer, so I would imagine any sane individual would not; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00544.html (7,754 bytes)
8. Re: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: MJSUKEY@cs.com; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:13:19 EST; Joe, IMHO a balanced set of bars will do wonders for the car but it is hard to stop there. I run the full catalog of Mr. Goods suspension components. Rack mounts, front/rear bars, springs, bushings.; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00545.html (7,605 bytes)
9. Re: rear sway bars (score: 1): Author: webb@daikin-america.com; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:27:57 -0600; As for rescources, do you have a local SCCA chapter? Ours offers a "training" weekend at the start of the season, usually in March. It's only about $25 and includes several hours of classroom theory; /html/6pack/2003-10/msg00552.html (7,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]