Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*really\s+final\s+networking\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*really\s+final\s+networking\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. really final networking question (score: 1): Author: scott.hall@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:46:01 +0000; the cable is all run, the router is configured, just have to connect the drops and we're good to go. final question: because of a recent printer addition, I have more networked devices than ports on; /html/shop-talk/2005-08/msg00088.html (7,962 bytes)
2. Re: really final networking question (score: 1): Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:00:29 -0400; Yes. More specifically, a *hub* is analagous to a cable splitter. A switch is a smart hub. A 100Mb hub has 100Mb of bandwidth to share amongst all the ports. 4 chatty devices get 25Mb each. A switch; /html/shop-talk/2005-08/msg00089.html (10,173 bytes)
3. RE: really final networking question (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:00:49 -0700; Yes, on all points. A switch operates at a lower logical level than a router, on MAC addresses instead of IP addresses. It 'learns' which MAC addresses are attached to which ports by seeing traffic; /html/shop-talk/2005-08/msg00090.html (8,173 bytes)
4. Re: really final networking question (score: 1): Author: Mike Rambour <mikey@b2systems.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:00:52 -0700; a switch will do what you need but a hub is all you need. Switches and Hub are getting to the point where they are considered the same thing by many people but a switch technically knows where to sen; /html/shop-talk/2005-08/msg00091.html (7,296 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]