Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+classifications\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+classifications\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. new classifications (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:50:17 -0500; Howdy all. Say, when exactly did/do the new Stock Class reclassifications go into effect? I could've sworn that they were not supposed to take effect until 1/1/2001. You know, move all of the "slow"; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00624.html (7,419 bytes)
2. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 07:54:55 -0700; Yup, you sure did. The new stock class reorg is targeted for 2001 implementation. The cars you specifically mentioned are moves that were proposed by members or the SCAC, recommended by the SCAC, put; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00625.html (8,080 bytes)
3. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Bradley Lamont <lamont@mailhost.org>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:15:41 -0500; Ok, I'm confused... From the June 4, 2000 FasTrack: So, if the above changes were recommended to go into effect on 1/1/2001, then why is an E30 M3 listed in GS at the 2000 National Championship? Did; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00628.html (8,442 bytes)
4. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:34:53 -0700; Excellent point...Maybe GH can shed some light on this. My impression is that the M3 and maybe a couple others got lumped together in this paragraph but were specifically mentioned elsewhere. Except.; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00631.html (9,082 bytes)
5. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: Ghsharp@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:15:06 EDT; It's the_entrant's_responsibility to properly classify his car, not the National office (or Tech either, for that matter). The E30 M3 is_not_in GS this year. Someone will have to ask TC about his ent; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00643.html (7,384 bytes)
6. RE: new classifications (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:19:03 -0700; You know TC is kind of a shady guy, he probably just figured no one would notice him until he got his jacket. :) Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley jason.isley@alltel.com It's the_entrant's_responsibility to prop; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00644.html (7,894 bytes)
7. Re: new classifications (score: 1): Author: colan arnold <carnold@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:34:41 -0500; Another thing that I think is important to remember is the process for classing cars. Mid year class changes don't just happen on a whim. Please see 3.2 on page 54 of the 2000 Solo rule book. Any cla; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00653.html (8,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]