Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*inelegible\s+novice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*inelegible\s+novice\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 07:27:53 -0800; I was doing something at the trailer Sunday when an entrant in one of the novice classes asked me about a fellow competitor who had run 10 or more events the previous year. I was not able to locate h; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00126.html (7,176 bytes)
2. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 08:10:56 -0800; I think you suggested that the folks in the novice class talk to the guy, or maybe one of the regulars. Maybe he's not aware of the 10 or more rule. Let's try to get him to classify himself correctly; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00128.html (7,858 bytes)
3. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: Dan4223w@aol.com; Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 13:48:25 EST; The rules of eligibility aren't so clear. It depends on how many races there were the previous year, and some people may be too lazy to look that up (honestly, they might). I've never encountered a "; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00138.html (7,033 bytes)
4. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:22:07 -0800; "Novice Class is intended for beginning autocrossers. You are NOT eligible for the Novice class if you have: competed in more than 33% of any prior year's events (e.g., for the 2001 series: regular s; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00139.html (8,505 bytes)
5. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: Jim Ochi <jim_ochi@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:22:29 -0800; Jim; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00140.html (7,578 bytes)
6. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: Giles Douglas <giles@vy.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 11:49:48 -0800 (PST); Just asking for a clarification... Otherwise it would be pretty easy to win the novice trophy every other year! Giles; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00144.html (9,626 bytes)
7. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:00:38 -0800; Consider "competed in more than 33% of any prior year's events", the wording on the web page. If I didn't compete last year, but I did compete in 33% of the events in 1989, is that wording true or fa; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00151.html (12,015 bytes)
8. Re: inelegible novice (score: 1): Author: Dan4223w@aol.com; Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:00:27 EST; Ahh. The last time I looked at the rules it was 2002, and it listed the # of events there were for 2000! I didn't count on them updating it. Gotcha. My bad. -Dan; /html/ba-autox/2002-03/msg00357.html (6,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]