Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+swaybar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*front\s+swaybar\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. front swaybar (score: 1): Author: Larry Vaughan <ljvaughan@pldi.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:30:35 -0600; Hypothetical question. Will a bigger front swaybar cause understeer or oversteer with the following suspension. Lower heavier front springs and lowered stock rear swing spring. From 7/8" swaybar to 1; /html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00079.html (6,803 bytes)
2. RE: front swaybar (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:34:04 -0700; The situation you describe will in all likelihood cause massive understeer. With the rear suspension pretty well remaining as delivered from the factory, and adding significant stiffness to the front; /html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00080.html (7,714 bytes)
3. Re: front swaybar (score: 1): Author: "Nolan" <foxtrapper@ispwest.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:48:30 -0500; It's standard setup for the fastest Spitfires out on the track. Well known to racers for decades as a very good setup for a fast Spitfire. I've got most of it done to mine for racing, and I can say f; /html/spitfires/2006-03/msg00081.html (7,451 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]