Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fan\,\s+old\s+versus\s+electric\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*fan\,\s+old\s+versus\s+electric\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. fan, old versus electric (score: 1): Author: "Alan & Debbie Lindner" <theedge@cts.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 19:28:07 -0800; Hello Bob, In an old email, you discussed bang for the buck. You had stated that: "get rid of some parasitic load by dumping the crank driven fan and replacing it with an electric fan." What other be; /html/6pack/2002-01/msg00287.html (6,940 bytes)
2. Re: fan, old versus electric (score: 1): Author: Shane Ingate <madmax_xx@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:53:51 -0500; Not much that I can add to Bob's comments, except 4 things: 1) At least 6hp is freed. 2) The cooling capability of my 16" fan is fantastic; it will drop the water temp from 195F to 180F in less than; /html/6pack/2002-01/msg00315.html (7,851 bytes)
3. Re: fan, old versus electric (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:54:30 -0500 (EST); Hi. Well, there's the reduced drag on the engine. In most operating conditions, the fan is not needed at all, so the drag is not justified. Put in an electric fan with a thermostatic electrical switc; /html/6pack/2002-01/msg00317.html (8,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]