Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*digital\s+cameras\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*digital\s+cameras\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "Mordecai Dunst"<mdunst@smtplink.coh.org>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 98 11:17:33 -0800; -A little out of the realm of this list: Any experience with digital Cameras? Basically, looking for simple yet good quality digital camera for quick pictures and electronic transmittal or archive...; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00082.html (7,498 bytes)
2. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Mike Rambour <mikey@inline-tech.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 14:52:57 -0800; The only experience I have is the Kodak 120 and 210. I have borrowed the 120 from a friend many times and been impressed with it, its a 2 year old model I don't know if they made changes since then; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00084.html (8,221 bytes)
3. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: John Miller <johnm@ims.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:04:53 -0800 (PST); I beg to differ on the DC210 I own one and it is a full 1X to 2X zoom. Zoom in/out till you get the picture you want (1X, 1.5X, 1.733X, 2X, whatever). Works as I would want it to. The thing I want is; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00085.html (8,990 bytes)
4. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Larry Hoy <larryhoy@cwix.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:51:01 -0700; Check out http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webCatalog.pl?category=Digital+Cameras for Kodak info. Larry Hoy http://home.cwix.com/~larryhoy@cwix.com/ ==; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00086.html (9,206 bytes)
5. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: miq@teleport.com; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:07:00 -0800 (PST); Or check out this page on cnet.com: http://www.computers.com/reviews/comparative/intro/0,23,0-2002-676945,00.html?st.cn.fd.gen.co they review 19 digital cameras under $500 -- __ Miq Millman miq@telep; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00087.html (7,985 bytes)
6. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Jim Van Hooser <jvanho01@tir.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 20:25:25 -0500; I currently have an Olympus digital camera and it does all that needs to be done - zoom and macro. Jim & D'Anne Van Hooser jvanho01@tir.com; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00089.html (8,166 bytes)
7. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Bob Hamilton <hamilton@cast.navnet.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 22:48:44 -0400; I bought a Casio ~$300.00 earlier this year and it was fine for just sending a small, fair quality picture but recently replaced it with a Fujifilm MX-700 which is in the $1,000.00 bracket. This giv; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00090.html (9,642 bytes)
8. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "Tw Cook" <tw@mcc.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 21:38:35 -0600; You can expect significant cost reductions in digital cameras over the next year or so. The currently used CCD image sensors are fairly expensive to manufacture, and can be built by only a few fabs a; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00091.html (8,793 bytes)
9. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "The Spectors" <larry_spector@usa.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 09:52:08 -0400; I haven't taken the plunge for a digital camera yet- but I've had pretty good by adding Kodak's "PictureDisk" option whenever I get my film processed. It's ~$4.00 extra per roll, and what you get bac; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00092.html (8,445 bytes)
10. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Brian Kemp <bk13@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 09:12:44 -0800; I have to disagree in part. I ordered the Picture disk and was disappointed. All the pictures on the roll are saved on a 1.4M floppy disk with the application software. They are saved as a compressed; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00093.html (9,694 bytes)
11. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "Charles B. Andes" <cbandes@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:21:26 -0000; Good suggestion! I have used this service and confirm it is perfectly useful, even can provide very high resolution pictures with an option. Our discount photo service will provide the Kodak service.; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00094.html (8,977 bytes)
12. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "Tw Cook" <tw@mcc.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:33:55 -0600; This is a good point - you can get a good quality scanner for under $100 these days. With any kind of decent conventional photo the results will be better than all but the very top of the line digita; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00095.html (8,606 bytes)
13. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Marc Sayer <msayer1@concentric.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 13:25:33 -0800; I just recently bought a Kodak DC120 and my only complaints are its size and the lack of a lens cover. It is a rather large bulky thing compared to some of the newer cameras. However with the format; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00096.html (11,025 bytes)
14. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "John Mikes" <jmikes.gt4.38@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 16:53:06 +0000; I offer this opinion as a former semi-pro photojournalist with a closet full of old Nikons. Digitals are fine if all you want are lower quality "snapshots." If you want stuff you can enlarge and stil; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00097.html (8,405 bytes)
15. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "The Spectors" <larry_spector@usa.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 08:13:11 -0400; You're right about the Picture disk quality- it's not great but I find it anyway. I use it mostly to email pictures of my son to family, and occasionally for simple web pages. The photos on http://ww; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00098.html (9,897 bytes)
16. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Keith Kaplan <keithka@microsoft.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 18:38:51 -0800; Exactly. For about $20,000 you can get a digital camera that produces a picture that's still lower resolution than what you get from a $10 disposable film camera. Not to mention the fact that the dis; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00127.html (9,460 bytes)
17. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: "Gerald Brazil" <gerrybraz@voyager.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 22:11:09 -0500; Keith wrote..."I see that Polaroid has a camera now that's DeWalt yellow for the contractor market." That is probably more for the lawyers than the contractors. 0;-) GJB; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00128.html (7,666 bytes)
18. RE: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Bob Bachman <bobach@voyager.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 23:04:22; You might consider the "Barbie Digital Camera" currently forsale at Best Buys for $70. A friend of mine bought one for his 7 year old daughter but can't give me a evalution until after Christmas. :-; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00129.html (8,297 bytes)
19. Re: digital cameras (score: 1): Author: Richard George <rkg@teleport.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 08:14:35 -0800; Actually, I have a sharp video camera I use just for this purpose - I stuff it in a plastic bag with just the lens sticking out - I got it before everybody was putting big lcd screens on their camer; /html/shop-talk/1998-11/msg00133.html (10,238 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]