- 1. chute loads v/s time (score: 1)
- Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:59:44 -0500
- Howdy, when I was skydiving back in the 80's, I built a DAS for altitude and loads on the chute vs time. most skydives were from a 10,000 ft in a flat and stable freefall, with a pull altitude of 250
- /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00019.html (8,337 bytes)
- 2. chute loads v/s time (score: 1)
- Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:26:43 -0500
- During the test time for the ParaMonitor, (cool name huh?) one of the chute manufacturers maintained there was a "spike" of load that destroyed chutes. the engineer and I that developed my system dis
- /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00022.html (7,785 bytes)
- 3. Re: chute loads v/s time (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:14:25 -0700
- I posted a reply a few days ago saying that I didn't use the chute prior to the 2003 finals when I was scolded for not using it. I just went back to my data and put together some info of stopping di
- /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00027.html (7,671 bytes)
- 4. Re: chute loads v/s time (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:22:10 -0700
- I almost agree with your last statement John. From what I've seen, it's: 1) Incorrect packing. 2) Bad packing 3) Sloppy packing. 4) Dirty chute (glued together by salt) 5) Incorrect mounting. 6) Inco
- /html/land-speed/2004-07/msg00033.html (9,114 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu