Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cast\s+iron\s+vs\.\s+Stainless\s+expansion\s+rate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cast\s+iron\s+vs\.\s+Stainless\s+expansion\s+rate\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. re: cast iron vs. Stainless expansion rate (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:30:09 -0400charset="Windows-1252"; expansion rates are tied to metal thickness> Thickness of metal has nothing to do with rate of expansion. Rate of expansion is a material property expressed in (distance per unit of distance) per de; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg01223.html (8,550 bytes)
2. Re: cast iron vs. Stainless expansion rate (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:10:56 -0700; I assume you are referring to my response. I did not mean to imply that expansion is tied strictly to metal thickness, only to point out that stainless headers are much thinner than your typical cast; /html/triumphs/2000-09/msg01229.html (7,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]