Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bugeye\s+fuel\s+tank\s+sender\s+unit\s+$again$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bugeye\s+fuel\s+tank\s+sender\s+unit\s+$again$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. bugeye fuel tank sender unit (again) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:30:34 -0500; Anyone help me out with this fuel tank sender? I am getting constant 0 ohms resistance regardless of the float position in testing. Is it supposed to be like this? I am told maybe its supposed to var; /html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00813.html (7,188 bytes)
2. Re: bugeye fuel tank sender unit (again) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:53:25 -0500; Are you sure you have the float hooked up to the gauge and also have the gauge and float grounded when testing? -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ 2 Sprites, 2 Midgets http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut; /html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00818.html (7,731 bytes)
3. Re: bugeye fuel tank sender unit (again) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:19:15 -0800; 0 Ohms Probably a broken lead wire. Maybe a bad ground. 14 Ohms Full tank. 90 Ohms Approximately 1/2 tank. 258 Ohms You ought to be lookin' for gas. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordo; /html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00820.html (7,176 bytes)
4. Re: bugeye fuel tank sender unit (again) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:58:23 -0500; Dont have one for a bugeye, but the one from a 70 should work about the same. Measuring positive to the wire and negative to the baseplate. Full - 25 Empty 282 ohms resistance regardless of the floa; /html/spridgets/2003-02/msg00830.html (7,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]