Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bricklin\s+mailing\s+list\s+dead\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bricklin\s+mailing\s+list\s+dead\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: Lbc302@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:01:11 EST; Am I the only person left on the Bricklin mailing list,Come on! I miss the the comments and questions.Wake up out there!! Ok,I have a good question,which car is more superior the Bricklin or the Delo; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00056.html (7,584 bytes)
2. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: Isensee@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:24:31 EST; Having driven a Bricklin for several years and read a lot about DeLoreans, here are my opinions. Delorean? The DeLorean is a better designed and better build car. Much more professionally executed. T; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00057.html (8,669 bytes)
3. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin" <kevin_hand@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:50:34 -0800; To Claude & Everyone else: First to everyone else on the mailing list... Thanks for the information in response to my request for information on West Coast Bricklin Shops...Stan Fransen in Chino has; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00059.html (10,372 bytes)
4. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "Kevin" <kevin_hand@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:58:12 -0800; Thanks for the comments Scott...by the way, the picture of your car is my windows wallpaper! As an addendum to my comments in response to Claude, I left out thanking Kim Marlia, he too, has been very; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00060.html (9,825 bytes)
5. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "yugoman" <mdrig@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:14:31 -0500; Well my wife has a 75 Bricklin (which she likes more for the curvy shape) and I have an 81 Delorean (which I'm partial to cause I wanted one ever since they came out. I was a little too young to know; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00063.html (8,528 bytes)
6. Fw: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:48:24 -0500; At the risk of starting another heated debate over what info should or should not be published in the public domain, have you joined Bricklin International yet? The club's quarterly magazine has a we; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00065.html (9,001 bytes)
7. Fw: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:55:55 -0500; They have a Renault Alum. V6. It was also used in some Volvos and Peugeots though. I know the local Volvo dealer works on them. As for reliability, I'm only familiar with one, and reliable it ain't.; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00066.html (8,057 bytes)
8. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "K M" <symbiotic@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:16:59 PST; Frankly, I lost interest and stopped posting because of the direction the email list took. But, hey, that is just me. Kim the the [snip]; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00067.html (7,651 bytes)
9. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: illyana delorean <illyanadmc@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:47:53 -0800 (PST); i don't think either is superior, they are both great cars in different ways! although i know nothing about how safe a delorean is, i would think that a bricklin would be safer. i mean, it was made; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00069.html (9,305 bytes)
10. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:24:34 -0500; Kim, et al. I hate to see a comment like this. Not that anyone is NOT allowed to make it. But remember, this mailing list, like the club, and any organization is only as good as its members. Kim, you; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00071.html (9,065 bytes)
11. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "K M" <symbiotic@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 21:13:18 PST; I think that I did just as you suggest. When I thought that the group was off track, I did post a comment on that issue (if I remember correctly, the post that I thought was off was something about a; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00087.html (8,960 bytes)
12. Re: bricklin mailing list dead? (score: 1): Author: "K M" <symbiotic@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 21:12:54 PST; I don't really understand your comment. When I thought that the group was off track, I did post a comment on that issue (if I remember correctly, the post that I thought was off was something about a; /html/bricklin/1999-03/msg00088.html (9,011 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]