Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*best\s+line\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*best\s+line\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Kit Wetzler" <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 23:01:04 -0700; Exactly why I drive a featherweight rice bucket. ;) -Kit S2000; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00067.html (8,317 bytes)
22. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Larrybsp@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:48:22 EDT; Kit, I'll grant you light cars stopper better than heavy cars in most instances. I can't change the laws of physics. I do not agree that that a light car will be faster because it probably has a frac; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00070.html (9,130 bytes)
23. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 08:44:43 -0700; Well Larry you do have a point, all else is not equal. It's all in the power to weight ratio and the shape of the torque curve. Typically light rice buckets have about 75% the weight of big Vettes, b; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00072.html (9,862 bytes)
24. RE: best line (score: 1): Author: David Peterson <peterson@ati.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 08:45:32 -0700; And to counter that - watching and learning once from Josh, keep wide which keeps the R's up, which keeps the T or the P up (let's not get into that discussion again), which is VERY important in a ca; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00073.html (9,343 bytes)
25. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 09:01:40 -0700; Jerry and others drive cars with horsepower. The Ghia doesn't have that (and neither does our 7), so speed has to be maintained throughout. My philosophy is to use brakes as little as possible becaus; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00075.html (10,481 bytes)
26. RE: best line (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:51:45 -0400; Message text written by "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" "Not to bring up this issue again, but does anyone have comments about the relative importance of this principle on gated courses vs. mini-road; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00077.html (10,516 bytes)
27. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Kit Wetzler" <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:08:47 -0700; <<To: Larrybsp@aol.com CC: kitwetzler@mindspring.com, ba-autox@autox.team.net Hmmmmm. . . perhaps that's because -- all else being equal -- lighter cars are faster, handle better and stop quicker? T; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00078.html (9,359 bytes)
28. RE: best line (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <nkahangi@interwoven.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:12:20 -0700; Oooooh, I smell a challenge! But I don't think you need to be present to win. I think we can do this by lap time (autox style :)). I don't have times at Button Willow, but 1:55s at Sears and 1:46s a; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00079.html (9,010 bytes)
29. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Kit Wetzler" <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:16:00 -0700; I really wish that we could measure times at like 3 points around the course... it'd definitely be cool to see if your 45.6 and your 46.7 meant that you went 3 seconds slower in one part but a secon; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00080.html (8,530 bytes)
30. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Jesse Wills" <jesse@wordex.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:36:22 -0700; Regualr season numbers for SS Corvettes: 1997 - 0 TTOD, 3 TPTOD (15 rounds) 1998 - 0 TTOD, 0 TPTOD (16 rounds) 1999 - 0 TTOD, 1 TPTOD (18 rounds) 2000 - 1 TTOD, 1 TPTOD (4 rounds) I am not sure what; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00081.html (8,545 bytes)
31. RE: best line (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@unify.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:41:30 -0700; Now do the same for Miata's and Integra's :-) Sorry, I'm biased :-) Kevin M.; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00082.html (9,210 bytes)
32. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Darren P. Madams" <darren@madams.com>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 10:46:57 -0700; It means that Mike Lella and Pete Mottaz are way too quick on the course, and the CS, BS and even AS PAX are way too easy!!!! :) --Darren "Mod car paxes suck" Madams btw, didn't Manny have a TTOD las; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00083.html (8,743 bytes)
33. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:33:55 -0700 (PDT); And that's a reason this Miata driver went down to 1st in a couple of places. I just couldn't get out of those spots very quickly coming out at 3K in second. Since we had the Stockton discussion earl; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00084.html (9,081 bytes)
34. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Larrybsp@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:18:06 EDT; I drive a black 1990 on 17x11's all around shod with 315 Kumho's. My car dyno'd at 383 ft.lb torque and 312hp at the rear wheels. Thats 365hp and 425ft lb of torque at the crank. I also have put on C; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00085.html (8,307 bytes)
35. re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Peter Mottaz" <mph_16@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 14:16:40 PDT; Thanks..."I think?" ;-P ...or are insinuating my lines stink? ;-) Pete (Though its no wonder...I couldn't keep my eyes focused half the time last year anyway) Mottaz All I know, is that from watching; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00087.html (8,602 bytes)
36. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 14:25:52 -0700; Which gave me a major epiphany (thank you Scot). This touches on a confusion I've always had about gearing terminology. From an engineer's point of view, the total gear ratio is measured as the rate; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00088.html (9,304 bytes)
37. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Scot Zediker <mx5_1991@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT); The way I always understood it, a higher number indicates lower gearing, e.g.; 4.30 is lower than 3.42. I guess you'd say "lower" because for a given engine speed you get fewer wheel rpm with the hig; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00089.html (9,909 bytes)
38. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 15:07:39 -0700; Then you toss in the rearend ratios. For instance, for years we ran a 4:55 rear. When we rebuilt the car, we went to a shorter (4:88) and found we had to shift too often, losing time. So we went to a; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00090.html (10,015 bytes)
39. Re: best line (score: 1): Author: "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net>; Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 16:24:00 -0700; Sure, the rear end ratio would be included if one is measuring the total gear ratio from the crankshaft to the wheel. That would be the transmission ratio multiplied by the differential ratio. For ex; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00091.html (11,099 bytes)
40. RE: best line (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 18:11:41 -0700; 2.66 x 3.42 x 345 = "only" 3,139. Of course, that's peak torque. Now go look at the torque curves... KeS; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00092.html (12,128 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]