Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baja\s+weight\s+problem\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*baja\s+weight\s+problem\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: baja weight problem! (score: 1): Author: "John G." <jjjsix6@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:47:44 -0800; I don't know why you guys keep saying a frame made from 1.25 X .049 tubing is only good for 2 years. I'm now graduated but every car my team made since 1996 is still running and the 96 car was much l; /html/mini-baja/2004-11/msg00013.html (11,424 bytes)
2. Re: baja weight problem! (score: 1): Author: Craig <jponrocks@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:22:59 -0800 (PST); We use 1.25" 0.49 4130 on most of our cars now and they are lasting fine. We have one car thats is now on it's fouth year with basicly the same frame. However with hard rolls the frames don't kast as; /html/mini-baja/2004-11/msg00014.html (7,129 bytes)
3. Re: baja weight problem! (score: 1): Author: susantoa@pdx.edu; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:48:17 -0800; When you say frame should weigh 40-60lbs is that just the tubing or includes all of the bracketry (suspension, steering, drivetrain, engine brackets)? Also, we used 1.25x0.049 mild steel (A36) and fi; /html/mini-baja/2004-11/msg00015.html (7,373 bytes)
4. Re: baja weight problem! (score: 1): Author: Craig <jponrocks@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:55:30 -0800 (PST); I belive it would include our drivetrain/engine mounts __________________________________ The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majord; /html/mini-baja/2004-11/msg00016.html (7,936 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]