Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*X\-Stock\?\s+BMW\s+Z8\.\.\.\s+400hp\,\s+3000\#\,\s+0\-60\s+in\s+low\s+4\'s\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. X-Stock? BMW Z8... 400hp, 3000#, 0-60 in low 4's (score: 1)
Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:20:01 -0500
I realize its far too early for the SEB to be even considering classing this car, but that doesn't mean that team.net can't start speculating! My new dream car... the Z8... a 3000# 400HP Z3, should r
/html/autox/1999-09/msg01723.html (7,331 bytes)

2. X-Stock? BMW Z8... 400hp, 3000#, 0-60 in low 4's (score: 1)
Author: Ron Katona <ron3b@cris.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:48:48 -0700
Hate to ruin a dream, but... I don't think it will outperform a C5. There, I'm a BMW nut and I said it. The problem is that the M Roadster already weighs 3000 lb or more. The Z8 is going to be a flag
/html/autox/1999-09/msg01792.html (7,729 bytes)

3. Re: X-Stock? BMW Z8... 400hp, 3000#, 0-60 in low 4's (score: 1)
Author: Brian M Kennedy <kennedy@i2.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:15:18 -0500
Yep, that would ruin a dream -- haven't seen that quote. The quotes I've seen say they are using an aluminum skin and aluminum space frame in order to keep the weight under their target: 3080 lbs. Al
/html/autox/1999-09/msg01804.html (8,437 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu