- 1. Re: Why Corvairs? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 02:05:11 EDT
- << Technically and historically, they are one of the most interesting American cars ever. First rear engine, first extensive use of aluminum, first modern air-cooled engine, first high production tur
- /html/triumphs/1998-05/msg00001.html (8,050 bytes)
- 2. Re: Why Corvairs? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 09:59:44 -0800
- Thank you for your well written comments regarding the Corvair. I am in complete agreement. The Corvairs were fun, reliable, and economical. I had to sell my first TR3 a '57, due to the birth of my
- /html/triumphs/1998-05/msg00046.html (7,474 bytes)
- 3. Why Corvairs? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:50:28 -0500
- To begin with, Ralph Nader was only interested in Ralph Nader, as most "media lawyers" are. His diatribe against the US automotive industry brought about the first significant federal regulation of a
- /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg02190.html (10,137 bytes)
- 4. Re: Why Corvairs? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 00:59:22 EDT
- In the US did'nt Tucker build the first rear engined, air-coold car? ok so it wasnt exactly hi production, but ithink it ws to be offered with turbo. I have seen several in SCCA events.....with good
- /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg02193.html (6,150 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu