Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+is\s+the\s+best\s+clutch\s+brand\?\s+Important\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+is\s+the\s+best\s+clutch\s+brand\?\s+Important\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. What is the best clutch brand? Important! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 09:53:28 -0400; Sure did. But my new question is this: What is the BEST clutch brand to install? The one that failed worst was a Quintin Hazel. Is LUK any better? I specified Borg and Beck last time, and am having s; /html/triumphs/1996-10/msg00847.html (6,941 bytes)
2. Re: What is the best clutch brand? Important! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:44:19 -0400; I've had great miles and service from Borg & Beck from TRF. Same experience as you with Quentin Hazel, only on U-joints. Those buggers didn't last 5,000 miles. Michael Godafoss@AOL.com Palo Alto, CA; /html/triumphs/1996-10/msg00867.html (6,400 bytes)
3. re: What is the best clutch brand? Important! (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 17:19:48 -0400; I thought I read a year or so ago that TRF was trying an"experimental" clutch kit, comprised of a mix of LUK and B&B(?) parts. Apparently, for each manufacturer different parts were more prone to fai; /html/triumphs/1996-10/msg00908.html (6,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]