Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+about\s+the\s+Mustang\s+II\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*What\s+about\s+the\s+Mustang\s+II\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 19:35:47 -0700; Hey, everybody. I just got this email from a Jonathon E. Beckendorfer. I've never heard of him before. This is a very strange letter; however, it brings up some very interesting questions. I have no; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00390.html (9,583 bytes)
2. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: Mike Taylor <miket@interaccess.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 22:02:27 -0500; I do believe a Mustang II finished 2nd in 1998 and 4th or 5th this year at Nationals in CP. That car has a few mods though, but still not a bad showing for "a dinosaur." Come to think of it, the masc; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00391.html (10,581 bytes)
3. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: 94kart <94kart@nycap.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 23:52:47 -0400; I guess the registration folks missed the "Mustang II sensitivity class" rick crowe; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00392.html (7,526 bytes)
4. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Ashcraft" <ashcraft2@home.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 05:55:22 -0400; To save bandwidth I didn't include the original. I agree 100%. Steve Ashcraft; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00410.html (7,055 bytes)
5. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 06:42:31 -0500; A bunch of well placed sarcasm to illustrate the rediculousness of the "I" class argument., was my take on this letter. Kinda funny actually, but brings up no real questions in my mind. PLW; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00414.html (7,602 bytes)
6. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 05:49:53 -0700 (PDT); -- "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com> "forwarded": Have 'em talk to Erik S. about the casinos... ;) (whose literacy and sarcasm seem oddly familiar...just whose nom de keyboard could this be?) Craig B.; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00419.html (7,437 bytes)
7. Re: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 13:01:50 -0400; Branching out into Fiction, Ace Reporter? :) <rolls eyes> OK, now that the cheeze tray has been by... :) if OK, here's the meat of Katie's Modest Proposal (he said Swiftly) - You have a population of; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00440.html (12,349 bytes)
8. RE: What about the Mustang II? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 11:15:31 -0700; I can't possibly quote DG's post here to try to respond to it. I just think that there out to be a rule which is that we shouldn't have rules that take more than ten paragraphs to explain. Katie Kell; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00451.html (15,061 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]