Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*We\s+Be\s+Tight\s+\-\-\s+Aircleaners\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*We\s+Be\s+Tight\s+\-\-\s+Aircleaners\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. We Be Tight -- Aircleaners? (score: 1): Author: Chuck Ciaffone <chuckc@attglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:01:41 -0500; OK, while I ponder the possibilities of K&N Filters, how about this for a totally reversible We Be Tight set of "fancy" air cleaners: 1. Take apart the 2 stock filter cans. b. Discard the larger top; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00123.html (7,599 bytes)
2. Re: We Be Tight -- Aircleaners? (score: 1): Author: type79@ix.netcom.com; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 11:50:38 -0500; Not only will it work, but that is exactly the setup on my car except that for the base. A friend machined bases from aluminum and radiused the inlet. He also machined two discs out of the same mate; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00125.html (8,401 bytes)
3. Re: We Be Tight -- Aircleaners? (score: 1): Author: "wizardz" <wizardz@maxinter.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 10:52:43 -0500; It's not just the boxes...it's the elements themselves. Also note...the boxes actually help in the velocity of the air entering the carbs. That is to say...you'll notice the air intake on the box is; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00129.html (9,470 bytes)
4. Re: We Be Tight -- Aircleaners? (score: 1): Author: Chuck Ciaffone <chuckc@attglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 13:12:06 -0500; Just fabbed a mock-up of the open filters using WIX filters without the cans. Really seems a little more lively on the back roads here. Gonna keep playing. Don't think it can hurt anything, can it? L; /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg00145.html (7,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]