Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Very\s+short\s+Rods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Very\s+short\s+Rods\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Very short Rods (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 21:12:17 -0400; I have a tiny .01 cubic inch 2 cycle model airplane motor that runs on nitro glow fuel. It has a 1/2" or shorter rod. Even at 20,000 rpm it puts out much less than 1/8 HP. I have also seen a diesel; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00099.html (7,445 bytes)
2. Re: Very short Rods (score: 1): Author: befarkas@ncsu.edu (Brian E. Farkas); Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 21:30:51 -0500; ha ha ha ha ... I just had to reply! Your killing me! I love this stuff... b; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00100.html (7,961 bytes)
3. Re: Very short Rods (score: 1): Author: befarkas@ncsu.edu (Brian E. Farkas); Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 21:36:44 -0500; hmmm, if we say that the model plane engine produces 1/20 hp (which is much less than 1/8 hp) then by my calc. it is producing 0.05 hp/0.01 cu. in. = 5 hp/cu. in. !! Say...that's pretty good! Now, if; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00101.html (8,158 bytes)
4. Re: Very short Rods (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 07:11:09 -0700; Now that's a good illustration of the kind of pseudo-science we are dealing with here. Good report. Just too many self-anointed experts quoting ill-informed journalists and believing "Truth" has bee; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00107.html (7,223 bytes)
5. Re: Very short Rods (score: 1): Author: DrMayf@aol.com; Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 10:55:47 EDT; Jeeze, I knew it. I used the wrong engine. I needed a boat motor all along, a diesel one at that! That 6 foot long rod however, is gonna cause some air resistance however. Maybe I should use lots of; /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00109.html (6,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]