Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vacume\s+Advance\s+Opperation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vacume\s+Advance\s+Opperation\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Vacume Advance Opperation (score: 1): Author: James <james.carpenter@ukaea.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:07:50 +0000; Here is a puzzeler that I don't understand, to do with the vacume system on the UK Spitfires, and most car's. The vacume advance is connected to a tap point on the rear carb. This apperes to be the w; /html/spitfires/1998-08/msg00142.html (7,091 bytes)
2. RE: Vacume Advance Opperation (score: 1): Author: "Childs, David" <dchilds@epri.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:59:59 -0400; I have a DGV with the same system. I have the same questions! I drilled and taped a port in the intake manifold and was happy with the performance. The idle is better and top end is good. I think tha; /html/spitfires/1998-08/msg00143.html (8,244 bytes)
3. Re: Vacume Advance Opperation (score: 1): Author: James <james.carpenter@ukaea.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:09:16 +0000; Trouble with my car is I don't know if it's suposed to have the tap at that place. The carbs althogh they are the right type, are not the specfifc number. Vacume advance data though... RKC0638 Non US; /html/spitfires/1998-08/msg00146.html (9,000 bytes)
4. Re: Vacume Advance Opperation (score: 1): Author: Patrick Barber <sailnbail@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 22:55:26 -0400; I am not sure if this will shed some light on UK Spitfires but this is what I have learned on the US Spitfire (Particularly the 74 Spit). On the 74 US Spitfire, there were 2 vacuum advance Ports. Act; /html/spitfires/1998-08/msg00154.html (9,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]