Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Undercoating\s+Removal\s+Safety\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Undercoating\s+Removal\s+Safety\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 10:38:45 -0400 (EDT); Sorry to be pedantic here but in the interest of safety, I feel I must comment. The use of fuels and kerosenes to dissolve undercoating is rather dangerous, especially if used in combination with an; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01132.html (7,238 bytes)
2. Re: Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:10:53 -0700; That is all fine, but what if you want to save the paint underneath? Like the example of the car with the undercoated engine compartment. The gel will of course go through the paint as well. I still; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01147.html (8,276 bytes)
3. Re: Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 18:42:23 -0700; All good points. The use of a welding torch to remove undercoating was in jest and I don't recommend anyone try it at home, or anywhere else. I have been less than thorough prepping for a weld and s; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01199.html (8,526 bytes)
4. Re: Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 19:56:02 -0700; Diesel doesn't have a flash-point nearly as hazzardess as gasoline, etc... Needless to say... but perhaps, better to mention it... yes, one should always be careful when working with flammable solven; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01205.html (8,602 bytes)
5. Re: Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:37:19 -0400 (EDT); You are correct, in that the chemical stripper is hazardous, but at least its not highly inflammable. You don't want to get it on your skin or in your eyes certainly because it will cause a nasty ch; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01220.html (8,596 bytes)
6. Re: Undercoating Removal Safety ... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 17:45:03 -0700; I think you get the point... it's all risky... to th list: evaluate the and go with what works for you. In this particular matter, I would not use chemical stripper... But this is my preference. And; /html/triumphs/1998-08/msg01295.html (9,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]