Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U\s+joints\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. U joints (score: 1)
Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:02:31 -0500
Got a question, I'm getting the "POP" from the drivers side wheel at initial acceleration. Universal getting ready to die ! Has anyone crossed the Part # over to a easy item available from NAPA or on
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00504.html (7,426 bytes)

2. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Tburke4@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:41:03 EDT
Hi Craig, A while back, I spoke to a guy in Sacramento who had his rear axle assembly rebuilt using U-Joints from an early model Ford Ranger (the Mazda variety). The axle shop said they were substant
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00505.html (7,904 bytes)

3. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: PorscheRcr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:23:36 EDT
<< A while back, I spoke to a guy in Sacramento who had his rear axle assembly rebuilt using U-Joints from an early model Ford Ranger (the Mazda variety). >> I don't believe Rangers were ever built b
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00509.html (7,331 bytes)

4. RE: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Pedretti <chuckp@magenic.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:46:04 -0500
It's actually the opposite. The Mazda's are built by ford. The current B series trucks are the same as the ford ranger with a few cosmetic changes. Chuck P (In St. Paul - where the rangers are built;
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00511.html (8,185 bytes)

5. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Tburke4@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:25:42 EDT
You're right, Bill. I believe he said early Ranger, but I had the Courier in mind when he said it. In any case, I recall that the UJ's were more robust. I'll e-mail him and ask if the list is interes
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00512.html (7,678 bytes)

6. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Flinthoof Ponypal <Flinters@picarefy.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:54:24 -0700
Universal Joints for 62-80 Triumph Spitfires: Spicer: 5-111X Precision/Napa U-joints: 341 Both carry a lifetime warranty and are commonplace in most store's inventories at NAPA. Kinda makes me wish I
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00513.html (7,985 bytes)

7. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Smith" <earl56@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:37:58 -0000
I just bought a set from my friendly Napa dealer this morning .They crossed over to a chevy luv 4wd pu. Earl and kermit the 75 _________________________________________________________________
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00515.html (8,503 bytes)

8. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Flinthoof Ponypal <Flinters@picarefy.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:52:12 -0700
As memory serves me from years ago, the 341 Napa U-Joint was a very common number and fit a large variety of applications. Which kind of makes sense since Triumph used a lot of off the shelf parts in
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00516.html (8,234 bytes)

9. Re: U joints (score: 1)
Author: Tburke4@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:55:20 EDT
Sounds like I was in the right church (Pickups), but, the wrong pew (Fords) Thanks, Earl Tom Burke 80 Spit
/html/spitfires/2001-06/msg00518.html (7,549 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu