Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Trailer\s+jockey\s+info\s+\-\s+thanks\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Trailer\s+jockey\s+info\s+\-\s+thanks\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Trailer jockey info - thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Wayne" <w.farrington@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:14:38 -0700; Thanks for all the replies. Lots of good info. Looks like the commercial units designed to do this task are running around ~$1,000 - $1500 new. Didn't see any used with a quick scan of ebay. Don't kn; /html/shop-talk/2002-08/msg00185.html (8,136 bytes)
2. Re: Trailer jockey info - thanks! (score: 1): Author: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:36:35 -0700; Lawn tractors aren't made to take much weight. If you try this, consider making a dolly that's pulled by the tractor but carries the tongue weight on its own wheels. Eric /// unsubscribe/change addre; /html/shop-talk/2002-08/msg00187.html (7,803 bytes)
3. Re: Trailer jockey info - thanks! (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:39:16 -0400 (EDT); How about just making a little "trailer" for the tractor that had a ball on top? That way the tounge weight would go directly down and the tractor would just need to worry about moving the rolling w; /html/shop-talk/2002-08/msg00194.html (8,011 bytes)
4. Re: Trailer jockey info - thanks! (score: 1): Author: Jim Juhas <james.f.juhas@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:26:28 -0400; I tried this with a 14HP tractor, since I knew the tractor itself would never tolerate the tongue weight. Lots of wheelies, even with a reatively light trailer. Backing up is impossible, and going do; /html/shop-talk/2002-08/msg00200.html (7,605 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]