Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Today\'s\s+Tour\s+Tidbits\s+Three\s+\/\s+Classing\s+Q\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Today\'s\s+Tour\s+Tidbits\s+Three\s+\/\s+Classing\s+Q\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Today's Tour Tidbits Three / Classing Q (score: 1): Author: bluemr2@juno.com; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:53:15 -0500; I thought 94-95 MR2s were not stock class legal as there were less than 1000 made? My '98 rule book does not specify '91-'93 only, but I thought that the 1000 car rule prevent '94+ from running in s; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01251.html (7,628 bytes)
2. Re: Today's Tour Tidbits Three / Classing Q (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:02:33 -0600; Since there were no major changes to the cars from the 93 models, they pretty much fall under the 'MR2 Turbo' classification. The 1000 car rule states "Cars not specifically listed in Stock category; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01253.html (7,434 bytes)
3. Re: Today's Tour Tidbits Three / Classing Q (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:57:41 -0800; What I do find interesting is the rule book listing of CS MR-2s as years '85-93. The AS listing covers ALL turbo MR2s. What happens if you own a 94 or 95 naturally aspirated MR2? I guess they can pla; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01261.html (7,291 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]