Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+leather\s+seat\s+thread\s+prompts\s+a\s+question\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+leather\s+seat\s+thread\s+prompts\s+a\s+question\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Stuart MacMillan" <macmillan@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:11:45 -0800; Greetings listees, I've been off list for awhile, but my life is still full of MGB's! I see many of the same names are still on the list, so maybe some of you crusty old MGBers can help me with this; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00210.html (9,106 bytes)
2. Re: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:25:38 -0000; The seat frames would have changed in 67 with the wider tunnel for the 4-synchro gearbox, these have seat foams and covers with a corresponding taper. If you have the reclining seat backs they should; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00222.html (8,790 bytes)
3. Re: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:42:06 -0800; Hmmm, are you sure? I would say my 66 seats are also tapered; meaning, asymmetrically shaped (very subtly) to clear the tunnel. And the squabs for my 66 are visually the same shape as on, say, a 69,; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00253.html (9,324 bytes)
4. RE: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Stuart MacMillan" <macmillan@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:28:57 -0800; Thanks for the reply Paul, Actually, I'm not convinced there is any difference in the frame shape or size between early and late seats. The tunnel widens in front of the seat on later cars. I need so; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00254.html (9,087 bytes)
5. RE: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:28:34 -0800; Geez, that's what I get for not reading my mail over the weekend. Stuart: The later seat frames will bolt into the early car with no problem. The early seat kits will probably not fit on the late fra; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00255.html (9,286 bytes)
6. RE: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Stuart MacMillan" <macmillan@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:06:30 -0800; Thanks Kelvin, Sorry I doubted you! Actually, I have a set of late seats in my '65 with the original style covers in vinyl. They were done for me back in 1986, and I don't know for sure if they are s; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00258.html (10,484 bytes)
7. Re: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:48:17 -0000; In reply to both this and Stuart: Not the squab, which is the seat-back, but the seat-part itself. I've not looked at an earlier car in detail, maybe the frames and covers also taper but not so much,; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00284.html (8,992 bytes)
8. RE: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:11:15 -0800; Anyone else chime in too. Don: This is from playing around with early and late seats. The seat backs on the early seats are thinner than the late ones, so tall drivers have a bit more room. If you u; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00316.html (10,556 bytes)
9. Re: The leather seat thread prompts a question.... (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:03:16 -0800; My question would be, how new are the seats in this 73? By all accounts, new seat foams = high seating position. What we aren't sure about is whether that is merely in comparison to the old, worn-out; /html/mgs/2003-01/msg00318.html (9,016 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]