Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+dreaded\s+unleaded\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*The\s+dreaded\s+unleaded\s+problem\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "Sue" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 21:04:48 +0100; Here in the UK we're coming up to our own Millennium bugbear, as of 1/1/00 there's to be no more leaded petrol at the pumps. There are as many opinions as there are alternatives so I'm asking advice; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00103.html (9,379 bytes)
2. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "RALPH JANNELLI" <RALPH.JANNELLI@Prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:28:18 -0400; I've been using unleaded in my '72 for many years for a while I was adding a substitute every couple of tanks. Be that got to be tedious. I know run it on plain 87 Octane (US method) unleaded. So far; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00104.html (10,712 bytes)
3. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@mrdog.msl.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:54:31 -0400; OK, so we decide to wait for the full up treatment. For now. Probably magic. Local witches could probably put as useful a spell on your fuel pump. I have yet to see a mechanism which does not need r; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00111.html (10,788 bytes)
4. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Jim <jdeatsc1@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 05:51:18 -0400; Some thoughts on the lead issue. Since lead is two things, an anti knock additive and a lubricant for valve stems, why not induce something that solves both problems? I realize that the valve faces; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00112.html (11,898 bytes)
5. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Miles" <jem@clara.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 20:38:46 +0100; Your best approach will be to use an additive approved by the Federation of British Historic Vehicle Clubs. They organised a series of independent scientific tests of lead substitutes that were carri; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00122.html (11,752 bytes)
6. RE: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <QSWI646@email.mot.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:58:37 +0100; You have a better grasp of the situation than many people! The tin pellet "Magic Charms" are indeed a complete waste of time - my wife is a development Chemist for Burmah-Castrol and delights in win; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00176.html (9,926 bytes)
7. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "Dean Dashwood" <ddashwoo@ect.enron.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:13:20 +0100; 1 & 2 are, IMHO, the best solution, but you say you can't afford them, so: 3 - never heard of this, unless you mean additives, which you don't, because that's number 5! 4 - definitely don't! One ind; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00178.html (11,523 bytes)
8. RE: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <QSWI646@email.mot.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 11:56:18 +0100; Sorry, but I believe this report as much as those which claim VSR is reduced! These devices simple CANNOT do anything to the petrol - good or bad, they are totally insoluble in petrol. Incidentally,; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00180.html (9,399 bytes)
9. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Dave Gunter <david@at-home.demon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 13:09:24 +0100; For interest, I've just been quoted Ł225 from Anglian Triumph Services, that's for supply and fit, price includes all parts and VAT. -- Dave Gunter and TEX ('77 Spitfire 1500) Luton, Bedfordshir; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00182.html (8,074 bytes)
10. RE: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <QSWI646@email.mot.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:04:11 +0100; Anglian's price for an exchange head is 195 pounds, where Kipping charges 165 pounds. I'm not really interested in getting someone else to fit it, and Anglian Triumph are quite a long way from Swind; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00183.html (8,429 bytes)
11. Re: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 23:25:01 +0100; Now all of these devices make slightly different claimed they are all it to the at least 9 the last couple of Bill - trouble is that by its own admission, the ASA is a toothless tiger. I do know from; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00234.html (8,740 bytes)
12. RE: The dreaded unleaded problem (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <QSWI646@email.mot.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 10:02:54 +0100; Hi John, I realise that the ASA has little real power - this is borne out by one company (Broquet) in particular STILL making the same claims despite at least 2 adjudications aginst them. It's almos; /html/spitfires/1999-09/msg00266.html (9,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]