Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR3\/TR4$early$\s+seats\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR3\/TR4$early$\s+seats\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 17:14:05 -0500; Can someone please tell me which seat frames are correct for a TR3 and early TR4. I have 2 sets of seats, one has a flat bottom pan with a corresponding flat bottom spring cushion, the other set of s; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01130.html (7,025 bytes)
2. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 17:52:03 -0500 (EST); Your second question first. At about the end of the 1962 model year (CT15076) the seat design changed. One of the primary differences was that instead of the back of the seat tipping forward, the en; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01133.html (8,622 bytes)
3. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 19:57:01 -0500; << Also, I don't think there was a bottom "pan" on the '3, but was open springs on the bottom with a heavy wire about 4-6" from the back which hooks into a "bracket" on the seat frame. >> My '57 smal; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01138.html (7,251 bytes)
4. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 17:49:31 -0800; The flat bottomed one is correct for the TR3s. I don't know about the TR4s. Moss Motors reproduces the complete seat frames. Moss and The Roadster Factory has seat runners, TRF has the correct stuffi; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01139.html (7,474 bytes)
5. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 20:29:05 -0500 (EST); The illustration (plate AZ) in the factory Spare Parts Catalogue for the TR4 shows the recessed pan, but I've seen both types in TR4s. Could be variations on the theme from different suppliers? Agai; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01140.html (8,181 bytes)
6. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 07:47:08 -0600 (CST); I think the seat bottoms with the recesssion is the right one for your `4. The seats (left and righ) are not identical. One hinges at the backrest, the other does not. I can't remember exactly which; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01163.html (8,277 bytes)
7. Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 12:12:16 -0700 "Re: TR3/TR4(early) seats" (Nov 25, 7:47am); Having just redone the seats on my early TR4, I would agree that the recession is correct. And it's the passenger side that should hinge. -- Charlie Farwell 1962 TR4 #CT3852L cyf@dr.att.com; /html/triumphs/1996-11/msg01179.html (9,331 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]