Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-6\s+webers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\-6\s+webers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TR-6 webers (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 16:35:14 -0400; Thanks Tom et al for your thougghts on my Webers. "3/4 race" cam from IIRC Cal-Cam. I have never had good performance with the set up. At idle there is almost no vacuum. There is no power until about; /html/triumphs/1998-05/msg00389.html (7,034 bytes)
2. Re: TR-6 Webers (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 08:39:51 -0700; Given your descrition, the chokes are almost certainly too big. This is a fairly common problem - people use race setups that they get out of the book, and those setups are designed for ideal perform; /html/triumphs/1998-05/msg00487.html (6,860 bytes)
3. TR-6 webers (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:30:08 -0400; I am new to the list. I'm sure this has been covered many times, but here goes. I have an early 73 TR6. I rebuilt the engine about 15 years ago. At the time I put on the triple weber DCOEs with cann; /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg02087.html (6,647 bytes)
4. Re: TR-6 webers (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:12:29 -0700; Scott, You have a couple different things here. Without the specs on the cam to know what you have, you are guessing some about your setup. This however will not prevent you from getting a good runni; /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg02092.html (8,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]