Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stupid\s+question\s+perhaps\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Stupid\s+question\s+perhaps\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Stupid question perhaps?? (score: 1): Author: Philip Warburton <cplimey@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:38:34 -0700; I have searched the archives on this list as well as NASS but can find no What is the general consensus as to grade of gasoline to use in our cars? Specifically I am talking about the 73-80 15009s wi; /html/spitfires/2003-07/msg00193.html (7,374 bytes)
2. RE: Stupid question perhaps?? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:51:24 -0700; I have searched the archives on this list as well as NASS but can find no thread. What is the general consensus as to grade of gasoline to use in our cars? Specifically I am talking about the 73-80 1; /html/spitfires/2003-07/msg00194.html (7,802 bytes)
3. Re: Stupid question perhaps?? (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 21:06:32 -0400; My stock '72 always ran on the lowest grade (87). Bit since I had the head milled, it has needed 89. The later 1500's had even less compression than mine originally had. BTW, when a Spit knocks, it i; /html/spitfires/2003-07/msg00196.html (7,589 bytes)
4. Re: Stupid question perhaps?? (score: 1): Author: Dave Chu <dave@ece.concordia.ca>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 21:25:01 -0400; I use 87 octane on my 78 Spit with a stock engine and 4-1 header. Dave |\ | | | _______________________________________/\ /\ /\_____| \|_____| |____________ Dave Chu \/ \/ | /| | | Dept. of Elec. & C; /html/spitfires/2003-07/msg00197.html (8,151 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]