Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spoilers\s+vs\.\s+vents\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spoilers\s+vs\.\s+vents\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Spoilers vs. vents (score: 1): Author: "John L Staiger" <staiger3@starband.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:02:23 -0500; Speaking of experience... Has anyone ever run reverse NACA ducts...say 2 - 3"er's on the rear deck of a sports or comp coupe to try and create a low pressure area under the rear of the vehicle? John; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00335.html (6,764 bytes)
2. Re: Spoilers vs. vents (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:06:41 -0500; NACA ducts don't work in reverse ant better than any other type of; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00344.html (7,165 bytes)
3. RE: Spoilers vs. vents (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:28:59 -0600; If I remember correctly, NACA ducts depend on laminar flow to work efficiently and by the time airflow over a sports or comp coupe gets to the rear it's pretty turbulent. I don't know if NACA ducts; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00352.html (7,348 bytes)
4. RE: Spoilers vs. vents (score: 1): Author: Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:02:18 -0700; No they don't work well in reverse (even though you see them used that way). The dropping floor of the NACA duct creates a low pressure area and the S-curved sides create a vortex which pulls air do; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00356.html (8,106 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]