Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+transverse\s+leaf\s+sag\s+\-\s+coil\s+over\s+boosters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Spit transverse leaf sag - coil over boosters (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 10:59:21 -0500
My first LBC was a 78 Spit with the traditional yielding of the transverse leaf spring. I purchased from my then local LBC supplier (English Only, in Detroit, since moved elsewhere and/or out of the
/html/triumphs/1999-11/msg00005.html (7,365 bytes)

2. Re: Spit transverse leaf sag - coil over boosters (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 13:40:04 -0500
[snip] Is this wise? I doubt the body shell is strong enough to actually carry some of the weight of the car (which is what you're doing), long term. -- Douglas Frank Compaq Computer Corp. ZKO 110 Sp
/html/triumphs/1999-11/msg00009.html (7,891 bytes)

3. RE: Spit transverse leaf sag - coil over boosters (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:01:17 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
Hey there -- Check out the air shock modification on the VTR maintenance website. This should give similar results with commonly found parts ($80 air shocks for Corvette). It's also adjustable. also-
/html/triumphs/1999-11/msg00010.html (7,339 bytes)

4. Re: Spit transverse leaf sag - coil over boosters (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 07:58:47 -0500
On the Spit, the upper shock mount is a 3-sided box section cantilevered off of the frame - not body mounted as on the GT-6. THe typical weight that the booster springs would carry is in the order of
/html/triumphs/1999-11/msg00046.html (7,597 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu