- 1. Shifter ergonomics (score: 1)
- Author: stubrennan@comcast.net
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 15:21:20 +0000
- Before you all jump on the short shifter bandwagon, consider this: I drove a "short shifter" Tiger a few years back, and it quickly became apparent why they changed to the long shifter. For me anyway
- /html/tigers/2005-05/msg00046.html (6,964 bytes)
- 2. RE: Shifter ergonomics (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 12:06:36 -0400
- I seem to recall reading that the change to the longer/"cranked" shifter was done in response to complaints from the in house vehicle testing personnel. Scott Before you all jump on the short shifter
- /html/tigers/2005-05/msg00048.html (7,547 bytes)
- 3. Re: Shifter ergonomics (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 09:27:52 -0700
- I would concur with Stu. Though everyone is built different and has their own preferences the short shifter seems impractical. O.K., granted it's 5 years and I have still yet to drive my Tiger, I hav
- /html/tigers/2005-05/msg00049.html (8,208 bytes)
- 4. RE: Shifter ergonomics (score: 1)
- Author: "Fisher, Curtis" <Curtis.Fisher@ngc.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 15:05:04 -0700
- When I outfitted the Tremec in the Tiger, I looked through the Hurst shifter catalog and they offer handles that put the knob in any X-Y-Z coordinate that you could want. I sat in the car, putted my
- /html/tigers/2005-05/msg00052.html (7,720 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu