Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sandblasting\s+Masks\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Sandblasting\s+Masks\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Sandblasting Masks? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Mullen" <Tim.Mullen@trw.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:56:44 -0700; I recently had to do a small amount of sandblasting (a couple of A-arms) to remove some rust. Since I don't have a blasting cabinet I used a back corner of my back yard that's just bare dirt, so the; /html/shop-talk/2000-09/msg00026.html (7,016 bytes)
2. Re: Sandblasting Masks? (score: 1): Author: Stuart MacMillan <macmillan@home.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:53:54 -0700; This has to do with product liability. There is no telling what crap someone might blast off--lead in paint, and other heavy metal contaminants along with asbestos being possibilities. For "industri; /html/shop-talk/2000-09/msg00027.html (8,148 bytes)
3. Re: Sandblasting Masks? (score: 1): Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@cts.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:26:17 -0700; The risk depends on the blasting media and what you are blasting. There have already been good postings on the risks from the paint flecks you will create. I would like to mention the risks that depe; /html/shop-talk/2000-09/msg00029.html (8,526 bytes)
4. Re: Sandblasting Masks? (score: 1): Author: "Tim Mullen" <Tim.Mullen@trw.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:36:16 -0700; Several people wrote some good info... I suspect that this is the reason. Even the masks with dust filters AND chemical filters seemed to have this warning. I really would like to have a fresh air sy; /html/shop-talk/2000-09/msg00030.html (9,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]