- 1. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:26:44 -0700
- Hey - how about: * no spacers * factory stock shocks (no more trouble to check that what we have now for other things - like washers? :-) * factory stock sway bars * factory stock wheels - didn't com
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00675.html (7,387 bytes)
- 2. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
- Author: "MICHAEL WHITEHOUSE" <whthse@c2i2.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:53:07 -0600
- Gee Scott, I thought that my stock sway bars idea was radical! You can't possibly expect a stock class car to be .. well you know stock. Next, you'll be proposing that stock cars run on their OEM tir
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00677.html (8,251 bytes)
- 3. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
- Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 20:55:24 -0400
- equation! <snip> Probably less than you think, since most of those provisions in the rules pre-date heavy sponsor participation. In many cases, requiring *factory* replacement parts increases the cos
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00679.html (9,384 bytes)
- 4. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
- Author: bluemr2@juno.com
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:50:17 -0400
- Well, that would be one way to get all those pesky '91-'92 MR2s out of Stock... Bridgestone (our OEM tire manufacturer) no longer makes those tires (Potenza RE71) in the MR2 sizes!!! Brian '91 MR2 4
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00704.html (7,083 bytes)
- 5. Re: SWAY BARS???? and more! (score: 1)
- Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:15:10 -0700
- Hell, Michael and/or Scott... I wouldn't drive a STREET car without most of these changes. :) I'd give you *no spacers* except there are cars that came that way... Kimball Ayer DSP Fiat X1/9 "I only
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00711.html (7,615 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu