Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM\s+PAX\s+$was\:\s+02\s+Pax$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SM\s+PAX\s+$was\:\s+02\s+Pax$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. SM PAX (was: 02 Pax) (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:01:35 EST; I wrote Rick, and he replied that he had looked at the results of current SM cars and their preparation levels, and that they weren't PAXing all that well with the current numbers, and that he would; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00469.html (6,926 bytes)
2. Re: SM PAX (was: 02 Pax) (score: 1): Author: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 11:01:08 -0800 (PST); The take I've heard on this on the SM list (from a few, not all) is that it's so hard to set up these highly prepared cars that it's unreasonable to expect them to remain as fast as, say, their SP eq; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00473.html (7,744 bytes)
3. Re: SM PAX (was: 02 Pax) (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:02:05 EST; I'm in absolute agreement! Charlie; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00474.html (7,177 bytes)
4. Re: SM PAX (was: 02 Pax) (score: 1): Author: Elmoizme@aol.com; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:25:13 EST; He must have saw my times. Elton cars and their preparation levels, and that they weren't PAXing all that well with the current numbers, and that he would change the number if results warrant it. He; /html/ba-autox/2001-11/msg00476.html (6,778 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]