- 1. Re: SFR and its Solo II program (score: 1)
- Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:05:16 -0500
- Message text written by "Richard Urschel" "It would also be a good thing for anyone wanting to express their views to do so at a meeting. The Committee Members are not elected representatives." -- En
- /html/ba-autox/2003-11/msg00084.html (8,537 bytes)
- 2. Re: SFR and its Solo II program (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Urschel" <osp13@mybluelight.com>
- Date: 29 Nov 2003 03:57:11 -0000
- I also said it would be a good thing to read the documentation available, in this case, the Policy Statement as approved by the voting membership at large. http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/solo2charter.h
- /html/ba-autox/2003-11/msg00085.html (8,805 bytes)
- 3. Re: SFR and its Solo II program (score: 1)
- Author: Andy McKee <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 23:31:10 -0800 (PST)
- That's an incredibly productive thing to bring up, John. With the goal of keeping fresh ideas at the fore, perhaps we should impose Steering Committee term limits as well? -Andy _____________________
- /html/ba-autox/2003-11/msg00087.html (7,622 bytes)
- 4. Re: SFR and its Solo II program (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 02:05:03 EST
- Maybe you should share these names with the Solo 2 Region Chief, and let him make the call if he wants to appoint those individuals to the Steering Committee, despite their lack of attendance. Charli
- /html/ba-autox/2003-11/msg00090.html (7,370 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu