Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S2000\s+Class\s+$was\s+Ringers\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S2000\s+Class\s+$was\s+Ringers\?$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. S2000 Class (was Ringers?) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:10:31 -0800; It certainly is premature to class a car based on reports. I am simply telling you and anyone who is interested, my feelings on this particular car. Unlike the 1999 Cobra Mustang, the largest car mag; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00411.html (8,268 bytes)
2. Re: S2000 Class (was Ringers?) (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:53:58 EST; << Honda's perform better at the track than on paper. >> Andy While I agree with all of your other points, and that at this point more people would be served by putting the car in SS, I take issue wi; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00439.html (7,261 bytes)
3. Re: S2000 Class (was Ringers?) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:48:20 -0800; You are right about the current offerings from Honda, however, they also do not have a performance oriented car in the current lineup. You make my point in your post. You are "predicting" that the c; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00449.html (8,324 bytes)
4. Re: S2000 Class (was Ringers?) (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:55:32 EST; above its be I think you have to fall back on Andy's original post; it's all speculation at this time. I also think that Andy's personal feeling that it initially appears to be a SS vehicle has to do; /html/autox/1999-01/msg00464.html (7,657 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]