Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rod\/Stroke\s+Ratios\s+$Long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rod\/Stroke\s+Ratios\s+$Long$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Rod/Stroke Ratios (Long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:22:59 -0800; The most enlightening article I have read on the subject: Opinions vary on the ideal rod length-to-stroke ratio, but it is generally accepted that the closer this number gets to 2:1, the better. When; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00035.html (11,087 bytes)
2. Re: Rod/Stroke Ratios (Long) (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:27:45 EST; It hasn't been mentioned but another advantage of long rod engines is the reduction of second order shaking forces. These forces are more important in large 4 and 6 cylinder engines. They can only ca; /html/tigers/2003-02/msg00039.html (6,543 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]