- 1. Recommendations for handling spam (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hammatt <shammatt@sos.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 09:21:58 -0800
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --F8E134D41EE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I recently reported some spam to what I thought was the originati
- /html/shop-talk/1997-12/msg00078.html (13,356 bytes)
- 2. Re: Recommendations for handling spam (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Welty <rwelty@krusty-motorsports.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 23:52:05 -0500
- actually, it's of very limited value. netcom has some real problems when it comes to dealing with the spam problem; their management isn't letting their abuse desk do that which is necessary. it's so
- /html/shop-talk/1997-12/msg00099.html (8,193 bytes)
- 3. Re: Recommendations for handling spam (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Hammatt <shammatt@sos.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 21:02:29 -0800
- Richard I appreciate your comments. Can you enlighten us on now best to respond? Thanks. Steve
- /html/shop-talk/1997-12/msg00100.html (8,480 bytes)
- 4. Re: Recommendations for handling spam (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Welty <rwelty@krusty-motorsports.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 00:16:40 -0500
- the tricky part is determining the real source; this is where the netcom "help" message is badly flawed. generally, there are received: lines in all message headers. each time a message passes throug
- /html/shop-talk/1997-12/msg00101.html (9,256 bytes)
- 5. Re: Recommendations for handling spam (score: 1)
- Author: Duncan120 <Duncan120@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 1997 18:02:13 EST
- Regarding the porn that arrives........ I resent the time that I must spend getting rid of the stuff......... so I just forward it to the ACLU. And not just the organisation, sent it to a person.....
- /html/shop-talk/1997-12/msg00102.html (6,749 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu