Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rads\,\s+Ally\s+and\s+Otherwise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rads\,\s+Ally\s+and\s+Otherwise\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Rads, Ally and Otherwise (score: 1): Author: Editorgary@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:27:14 EDT; Believe that anyone with any knowledge of metals will happily tell you that a copper core is more efficient at cooling than an aluminum core. Only reason for running aluminum (other than looks) is th; /html/healeys/2004-09/msg00194.html (7,051 bytes)
2. Re: Rads, Ally and Otherwise (score: 1): Author: Eric (Rick) Wilkins <wilko2@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:24:32 -0700; While a copper radiator physically cools more for the same size radiator, aluminum allows for more radiator at a lighter weight. That translates into more cooling with less weight. The net is a bigge; /html/healeys/2004-09/msg00195.html (7,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]