Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rack\s+\&\s+Pinion\s+Conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rack\s+\&\s+Pinion\s+Conversion\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: WLHoss@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:30:40 EDT; This subject may have been flogged to death, but I haven't been a memeber of the list very long. As I start to put my TR3A back together this fall, I wonder if converting the steering to rack & pini; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00823.html (7,482 bytes)
2. RE: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:50:18 -0700; Opinions vary greatly, Bill. Mine is that a careful rebuild and adjustment of the stock steering box is better than a rack & pinion conversion. It lets you keep that fast steering ratio (which I rea; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00826.html (8,193 bytes)
3. Re: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Paul Willoughby" <paulwillou@socal.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:55:09 -0700; Here is a webpage with lots of info including suppliers of R&P kits and tips for rebuilding the original unit: http://iai.eivd.ch/users/fwi/cars/tech_talk/steering_frame.htm Sorry, I can't help you w; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00827.html (8,565 bytes)
4. Re: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: Geo Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:59:58 -0700; ...leaving the middle finger available for 'signaling' I guess. Seriously, I divide my TR driving time between a '3 and a '4 and the steering is the single biggest difference between those two. I lik; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00847.html (8,032 bytes)
5. Re: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: CarlSereda@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:14:43 EDT; <<I suppose if I was doing a lot of parallel parking the TR4 would be rated but for everyday driving the TR3 feels more nimble & responsive and certainly gives you a lot more feedback.>> I think it's; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00854.html (7,586 bytes)
6. Re: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:00:09 EDT; I think it's easier to parallel park in my 4-door Volvo 122s with worm/peg box - than my TR4 with rack & pinion. Steven Newell - back me up on this? ==AM== I do remember that all my various Volvo 140; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00859.html (8,239 bytes)
7. Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Brazinski" <wayne@brazinski.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:46:09 -0500; Well Paul is right about the R&P conversion, and yes it is expensive! It's one of those subjective things however and you can see from the posts that it goes both ways:-) I'm putting a Ford 302 V8 in; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00860.html (8,321 bytes)
8. Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Bill Brewer" <bbrewer@tvwireless.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:39:06 -0800; Hi Bill, I installed a R&P steering setup from British Auto Restorations (BAR) about 18 months ago and don't have any real complaints. It should last longer that the original cam & peg setup. My orig; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00988.html (8,858 bytes)
9. RE: Rack & Pinion Conversion (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:42:10 -0800; The cam & peg box in my (now wrecked) TR3A has only been rebuilt once in 45 years and some 300,000 miles ... and the rebuild only cost about $30 in parts (mostly because I didn't replace the worm or; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00991.html (7,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]