- 1. Pro Timing discussion at SEDiv meeting (long) (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:49:45 EST
- First, let me make clear that Dennis Grant was not there or involved in any way! :-) Second, here are my impressions after discussing this with Howard D. repeatedly this past weekend. Please do hold
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00605.html (11,118 bytes)
- 2. Re: Pro Timing discussion at SEDiv meeting (long) (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:50:22 -0500
- Thanks Mark. :) one-off It should be pointed out that one of the design decisions in the old timing system built into the launch proceedure a frustrating difference between ProSolo and Drag Racing -
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00607.html (12,617 bytes)
- 3. Re: Pro Timing discussion at SEDiv meeting (long) (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Cone" <conekiller@prodigy.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:57:58 -0500
- way Oh great! Lets get rid of 70% of the competitors in the Challenge by having a Stock/SP/MOD/Prep mini challenge. So the 7 Prepared cars that show up only have to beat 1 stock car to win... IMHO t
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00614.html (14,903 bytes)
- 4. RE: Pro Timing discussion at SEDiv meeting (long) (score: 1)
- Author: "Randy Chase" <randyc2@home.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:54:52 -0800
- That is flawed in that the second place in A-Stock deserved to go as much as the fastest person in a much easier class. I would rather keep it simple and if the one class supplied the fastest 4 or 5
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00616.html (8,066 bytes)
- 5. Re: Pro Timing discussion at SEDiv meeting (long) (score: 1)
- Author: "HEYWARD WAGNER" <h_kenyon@email.msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 23:47:09 -0500
- timing -- Dennis, WE ARE NOT DRAGRACERS!!!!!!! I hate to point this out, but the "lights launch" is one of the things that makes pro solo diffrent from anytihng else. If you are interested in your RT
- /html/autox/2001-01/msg00639.html (8,455 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu