- 1. Privacy was Re: looking for a phone number (score: 1)
- Author: type79@ix.netcom.com
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:38:19 -0500
- Fellow Listers, The subject of privacy recently discussed on the Healey List. The views expressed were mixed and I would suspect that will be the same on this list. In any event, IMHO, I think that i
- /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg01080.html (9,260 bytes)
- 2. Re: Privacy was Re: looking for a phone number (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Maclean <macleans@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:51:42 -0800
- I gave out the phone number that Dick had put in our publication to advertise the '58 he has for sale. While your privacy concern is legitimate, I don't think Dick would have put this number in the
- /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg01081.html (10,615 bytes)
- 3. RE: Privacy was Re: looking for a phone number (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Weeks" <lists@woozy.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:26:45 -0500
- Actually Jay has a pretty good point. All of these posts hang around a lot longer than most people realize. They are all searchable by anyone including those who have less scruples than most. Spammer
- /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg01082.html (11,899 bytes)
- 4. Re: Privacy was Re: looking for a phone number (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:15:59 -0800
- If you are worried about being contacted from information revealed on this list then you should not even give your name and general location. Unless your number is unlisted all that's needed is your
- /html/spridgets/1999-11/msg01083.html (14,038 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu