- 1. Plastic Film (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Hammatt" <shammatt@sos.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:58:10 -0700
- OK, anybody have any great ideas for removing the remaining 'fused-on' plastic film from old aluminum sheet that has been UV tested for the past 10 years? I've tried heat and that didn't help. The fi
- /html/shop-talk/2001-05/msg00089.html (7,121 bytes)
- 2. RE: Plastic Film (score: 1)
- Author: "Gerald Brazil" <gerrybraz@voyager.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 07:35:09 -0400
- Do you suppose leaving it out in the UV for another 2.5 years would take care of the rest of it? ;-) /// /// shop-talk@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majo
- /html/shop-talk/2001-05/msg00091.html (6,820 bytes)
- 3. RE: Plastic Film (score: 1)
- Author: JNiolon@uss.com
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 07:13:34 -0500
- how large a piece are we dealing with /// /// shop-talk@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubsc
- /html/shop-talk/2001-05/msg00092.html (6,631 bytes)
- 4. Re: Plastic Film (score: 1)
- Author: Derek Harling <derek.lola@home.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:22:15 -0400
- Your math is wrong - it would take 3.33 years at the same rate - or were you allowing for ozone depletion? Derek (apologies to Steve for not even trying to answer his very reasonable query.) /// ///
- /html/shop-talk/2001-05/msg00093.html (7,044 bytes)
- 5. RE: Plastic Film (score: 1)
- Author: ken.landaiche@nokia.com
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:29:48 -0500
- I think it would take an additional 3.33 years. :) Ken Do you suppose leaving it out in the UV for another 2.5 years would take care of the rest of it? ;-) /// /// shop-talk@autox.team.net mailing li
- /html/shop-talk/2001-05/msg00095.html (7,259 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu